A lot of the relationships out there, homo and hetero alike, didn't last long because one of the the 2 parties were too controlling, or in another word, dominating. Everything has to be done his/her way. While the other party might be submissive, there's only up to a certain limit that once that limit is breached, then you'll get a broken relationship.
I beg to differ.
I think in a relationship, there should be one who should call the decisions. Otherwise, if both are so ever spineless, decisions would take ages to be made. And by the time there's a final conclusion, it would be too late already.
But then again, there are some relationships that go a very long way. One party is like the decision maker, while the other just follow. It was like that, it's still like that, and it'll be forever like that. Amazingly, they lasted longer than everyone else.
And I pity the submissize party.
In my case, we're both versatiles. LOL.
Merdeka in Singapore I: Back to Bugis
1 day ago
9 comments:
both are versatiles? should i read it as plain as it suggests, or there r subtler meaning behind? lolll....
Hi clayden! both versatile as in..... bed and also ..decisions thingy rite? :)
Depends on the two personalities involved :) Takes a while to work out a balance after all.
wahhh.... u guys ah.... so hamsap one. hahahah
wahhh.... u guys ah.... so hamsap one. hahahah
HEHEe...
I am the one making the decision in the relationship but I also like to have my own life apart from work.. and that includes social and life and all...
so far, there has been ups and downs in the understanding from the boy although it's been 2 years plus.. coming to 3...
But some guys like to be the submissive one. Hehehe...
I think I'm dominant in a relationship... but submissive in bed..
Baha! I can't believe I just said that! xD
hmmh.. decisive ~ versatiles..
esp. if a man is indecisive.. better b ware & consider carefully..
Post a Comment